While most companies are diligent in understanding their P’s and Q’s, little attention is given to a group of chemicals known as PFAS. In fact, many consumers remain unaware of the dangers associated with these chemicals. PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, include compounds like PFOA, PFOS, and GenX. These chemicals have been widely used in various industries and consumer products, such as cookware, pizza boxes, and waterproofing agents. What makes PFAS particularly concerning is their persistent nature. Known as “forever chemicals,” they do not break down easily and can accumulate over time. This has raised serious environmental and health concerns, leading to regulatory actions and a surge in litigation.
The Perilous Persistence of PFAS
PFAS’ resilience stems from their strong carbon-fluorine bonds, making them resistant to degradation in the environment. This attributes to their ability to accumulate in living organisms, including humans, and potentially cause adverse health effects. The ubiquitous use of PFAS has resulted in their presence in soil, water, and air, contaminating the environment on a global scale. As a result, governments and regulatory bodies have become increasingly adamant about addressing the issue.
Recognizing the risks posed by PFAS, there is a growing demand for regulation and phasing out certain applications of these chemicals. While the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has outlined its approach to addressing PFAS through its Strategic Roadmap, much of the regulation remains at the state level. Different states have established restrictions, guidelines, and advisories relating to PFAS in areas such as drinking water, cosmetics, textiles, and even ski wax. Efforts are also underway to include PFAS in investigations and remediation of contaminated sites. The food and beverage sector is catching up with new regulations, with several states, including California and New York, implementing bans on certain PFAS types in food packaging. However, the absence of federal standards creates challenges for companies with operations in multiple states, as they must navigate varying regulations and compliance requirements.
The understanding of PFAS’ health and environmental risks has fueled a wave of litigation. Manufacturers, whether knowingly or unknowingly, using or producing PFAS find themselves increasingly vulnerable. Major players like 3M and Dupont have already proposed hefty settlements in lawsuits filed by public water system operators affected by PFAS contamination. Municipalities, water utilities, consumer protection groups, and individuals have also initiated legal action, citing negligence, environmental harm, product liability, and other claims. However, mounting a defense against these allegations can be incredibly challenging. Questions arise regarding the causation of alleged injuries, availability of scientific evidence, and the statute of limitations. These legal battles are set to address critical issues and shape future litigation outcomes.
The food and beverage sector has not been immune to the repercussions of PFAS-related litigation. Some lawsuits focus on false or misleading advertising claims related to food safety. For instance, a class-action lawsuit alleges that Coca-Cola’s Simply Orange brand falsely marketed its Simply Tropical drink as “natural” and “organic,” without disclosing the presence of synthetic PFAS on its label. Bolthouse Farms, a US beverage maker, is also facing a similar lawsuit due to claims that its Green Goodness smoothie contains toxic PFAS at levels exceeding federal health limits, despite being marketed as “100% fruit juice.” As regulations evolve, it is crucial for food and beverage companies to proactively assess their operations, supply chains, and potential PFAS risks. Developing a comprehensive risk management plan is essential.
The rising concerns surrounding PFAS and the hazards they pose cannot be ignored. From regulatory actions to mounting litigation, it is evident that the issue is swiftly gaining attention. Companies, especially those in the food and beverage industry, must stay informed, adapt to changing regulations, and take proactive measures to manage their PFAS risks.
Leave a Reply