The airline industry has a long history of setting conditions for the sale of their services, with the first commission cuts dating back to 1995. In a recent example, American Airlines made the decision to deny frequent flyer benefits to leisure customers of non-preferred agencies. This decision has left many smaller agencies feeling frustrated and disadvantaged. However, according to the law, every airline has the legal right to discriminate against agencies by providing benefits to some while excluding others. This was affirmed in the 1989 U.S. Court of Appeals decision in Illinois Corporate Travel Inc. dba McTravel v. American, where the court ruled in favor of the airlines’ rights to dictate conditions for the sale of their tickets. This means that airlines like American have the legal right to set limitations and restrictions on agencies, regardless of the impact on their businesses.
The reality is that individual agencies have limited power to challenge airline practices that may harm their business. Unless there is evidence of airlines conspiring or abusing their monopoly power in a way that directly harms consumers, agencies are at the mercy of airline decisions. Even if agencies were to pursue legal action, the lengthy process of antitrust cases and changing airline policies would likely render any efforts ineffective. The burden of challenging airline monopolies falls on consumers, who may have a better chance of proving abusive practices.
Industry organizations like the American Society of Travel Advisors (ASTA) play a crucial role in advocating for agency rights and consumer protection. In response to American Airlines’ decision to limit frequent flyer benefits, ASTA has taken action by urging the Department of Transportation to intervene and protect consumers from premature NDC rollout. By highlighting anti-consumer practices and advocating for regulatory oversight, ASTA aims to provide a voice for agencies and travelers impacted by airline policies.
The recent decision by American Airlines to restrict ticketing access for non-preferred agencies has forced many smaller businesses to reconsider their partnership strategies. In order to continue issuing tickets on American, agencies are faced with the dilemma of either joining a preferred host agency or sacrificing ticketing capabilities. This decision further underscores the challenges faced by agencies in navigating airline policies and constraints. While some agencies may opt to forego airline ticketing altogether, others with high-volume ticketing operations face limited options for realistic alternatives.
The legal rights of airlines to set conditions and limitations on agencies pose significant challenges for smaller businesses in the travel industry. While agencies may feel the impact of discriminatory practices, the ability to challenge airline decisions remains limited. Industry advocacy and consumer protection initiatives play a critical role in addressing anti-consumer practices and advocating for agency rights. As agencies navigate the complex landscape of airline restrictions, strategic partnerships and informed decision-making are essential components of adapting to changing industry dynamics.
Leave a Reply